Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 71 of 71

Thread: Obama uses last few days in office

  1. #41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    I highly doubt that most sharks are in the habit of begging me to **** them, then proceeding to beg me to blast my bodily fluids inside them because "I just like the way it feels," and the whole time the shark was off the pill/falsified her charts so that way she'd get pregnant to trap me, and then 6 months later change its mind and decide to kill my son because killing people is how it gets its rocks off.

    Yeah. Sharks are that much smarter/better people/less manipulative/less murderous than women. I just went there. Or your analogy blows that hard.
    This sounds personal.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mod Dark Tower View Post
    *Sigh*, I'm such an idiot.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    I'm not very bright.

  2. #42
    Consul Sirveri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    I did.

    They do in sanctuary cities, that Cubans can't get here as easy because they use driftwood to float over the THE ****IN OCEAN to get here. That being said, why are you so quiet about Obama sealing a border. ALL illegal immigration must be stopped.
    It's 90 Miles, and people have swum it, including a 60 year old woman. The areas the Mexicans cross are in some ways worse, since it can be 90 miles across some very unforgiving terrain. Also, Sanctuary cities don't give citizenship, because they don't actually have the power to do that. They just refuse to cooperate with immigration officials.

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshyyy View Post
    There is some serious misquoting potential above.
    The rep system should be abolished.

  3. #43
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    I highly doubt that most sharks are in the habit of begging me to **** them, then proceeding to beg me to blast my bodily fluids inside them because "I just like the way it feels," and the whole time the shark was off the pill/falsified her charts so that way she'd get pregnant to trap me, and then 6 months later change its mind and decide to kill my son because killing people is how it gets its rocks off.

    Yeah. Sharks are that much smarter/better people/less manipulative/less murderous than women. I just went there. Or your analogy blows that hard.
    You do know that you are sitting right in the tin foil hat non-science conspiracy nut demographic here, right? Sure, that happens sometimes, so does men murdering their wives. But just because it happens occasionally I don't think it's relevant to completely stop marriage. Or to assume every married man is going to kill their wife. But, you know, if that's the way your mind works on this one issue, you are probably real pleased about donnie and his talking about autism when asked about vaccines.

    How about every time a woman gets pregnant accidentally, we castrate the man at fault? That might slow the incidence somewhat eh?

    and before anyone pulls on their outrage pants,I'm pointing out how you can find stupid arguments that make sense (in a warped way) for almost everything.
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  4. #44
    Consul Lurk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midwest U.S.
    Posts
    5,574

    Default

    Thanks for acknowledging that your analogy falls right into the wacko thinking basket.

    How about every time a woman wants to get scraped, she has to get her tubes tied during the procedure?
    Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.

    [7:32 AM] Jason (Al Bundy raidslave): Who the **** loses an arti to 18 phalanx
    [7:32 AM] Old Timer US1: The same faction that loses one to 66 legos

  5. #45
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    Thanks for acknowledging that your analogy falls right into the wacko thinking basket.

    How about every time a woman wants to get scraped, she has to get her tubes tied during the procedure?
    Makes about as much sense. Your whole argument is just ridiculous. The shark isn't you or her. Leave it to those who can think straight without personal involvement or witchery.
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  6. #46
    Consul Lurk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midwest U.S.
    Posts
    5,574

    Default

    Oh, I get that the shark is the kid. The problem is, most people don't voluntarily put the shark on their leg, and those that do that sort of thing generally end up in CBRFs. Most women who get abortions do so after consensual sex (I understand that your ideology doesn't typically acknowledge the existence of such, but indulge me). That's where your analogy fails hard, so I gave it far more respect than it deserved and made it work logically as best as it was capable of doing.

    You're welcome.
    Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.

    [7:32 AM] Jason (Al Bundy raidslave): Who the **** loses an arti to 18 phalanx
    [7:32 AM] Old Timer US1: The same faction that loses one to 66 legos

  7. #47
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    Oh, I get that the shark is the kid. The problem is, most people don't voluntarily put the shark on their leg, and those that do that sort of thing generally end up in CBRFs. Most women who get abortions do so after consensual sex (I understand that your ideology doesn't typically acknowledge the existence of such, but indulge me). That's where your analogy fails hard, so I gave it far more respect than it deserved and made it work logically as best as it was capable of doing.

    You're welcome.
    No, you really didn't. Consensual sex is between 2 people, but very few abortions are carried out on voluntary pregnancies. Usually only if the woman or child is at serious risk. So your analogy would be better if swimming is the sex, and every time you go swimming there is a very small chance you will get bitten by a shark, no matter how careful you are. Lets not blame every swimmer just because there was once an idiot who went out with a fresh and lacerated leg of mutton tied to him.

    But of course in this scenario, let's make it that only men can swim and only in guarded areas and only women can be lifeguards (so you require our consent to swim). You REALLY love swimming though, so you keep swimming and those lifeguards really love their job and keep encouraging you in. Now, when you get attacked by a dolphin and the only way to stop the attack is to kill the dolphin, shall I kill it? You might survive the attack if I don't, you could die, but it will take months for you to dislodge the dolphin and it will be a difficult time. You will probably lose a foot anyway (or do you think there are no long term effects to having a baby?) and the dolphin might not survive anyway. PETA might say let you take the risk, the dolphin is worth as much as you and whats a few months in the water compared to their life? I might kill it if you want me to anyway, even though most dolphins are great and deserve to live. You choose.

    Now that we are into the tunnel of metaphorical analogous analogies, lets dive on in (if the water is warm and not too bloody).
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  8. #48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    It's a self protection thing. He can't bear to think he was wrong.
    Sap, get over it. It's over.
    I still don't understand what you're talking about.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mod Dark Tower View Post
    *Sigh*, I'm such an idiot.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    I'm not very bright.

  9. #49
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sapient View Post
    I still don't understand what you're talking about.
    OOPS I missed the quote. It was to:
    Quote Originally Posted by Sapient View Post
    And if the hand on the tiller were Hillary, we would be invading Afghanistan and Syria within the next few months. I abhor her belligerence.
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  10. #50
    Consul The Blazin1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Murica... **** yeah
    Posts
    6,858

    Default

    Rok, no one here is saying if having the baby will kill it's mother she should be forced to have it, but people have abortions like it's a sport.
    Last edited by The Blazin1; 01-15-2017 at 01:54 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron D'Holbach View Post
    You should quote yourself. It's like liking your Facebook status or high-fiving yourself in the mirror.

    It's what I would do if I didn't have to keep mine exactly how it is for madsquirrels and erazer.

  11. #51

    Default

    I still don't understand. I think you're the confused one.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mod Dark Tower View Post
    *Sigh*, I'm such an idiot.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    I'm not very bright.

  12. #52
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    Rok, no one here is saying if the baby will it's mother she should be forced to have it, but people have abortions like it's a sport.
    Says a man. That's your misconception. It's a medical procedure that no one enters into lightly. But even if it was done early as a common form of birth control, so what? You can't support all the wanted children anyway.
    Last edited by Rokchick; 01-15-2017 at 02:32 PM.
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  13. #53
    Consul The Blazin1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Murica... **** yeah
    Posts
    6,858

    Default

    Says a man... back on ignore. I really can't ******* stand you rok. You are a miserable, man-hating, idiot, and you are a poor replacement for Ebol in these forums.
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron D'Holbach View Post
    You should quote yourself. It's like liking your Facebook status or high-fiving yourself in the mirror.

    It's what I would do if I didn't have to keep mine exactly how it is for madsquirrels and erazer.

  14. #54
    Philosopher н-υ-п-т-ε-я's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    in my body of course
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    And now you can use unborn children for human testing, organs and stem cells research. Well done abortion! Well done liberals!

    Incest is on the way!

    Legal cannibalism not too far ahead, not too far!

    Like pigs eat anything that they can bite, true brainwashed liberals accept anything that the people in power tell them to believe in!
    Quote Originally Posted by Avicenna
    That whose existence is necessary must necessarily be one essence.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rumi
    What you are seeking is also seeking you.

  15. #55
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    Says a man... back on ignore. I really can't ******* stand you rok. You are a miserable, man-hating, idiot, and you are a poor replacement for Ebol in these forums.
    Even if you don't see this, you are a dill. No man can understand something that they can never experience the same way some who could or does can. It's not anti man, it's just life. You can't get pregnant, you can't give birth and you can't have an abortion. I can't understand what a late stage circumcision is like, or how it can even be conceived.
    You can empathise, but you cannot understand, and telling me that abortion is being treated like a sport is trite, stupid and not even up to your low standards.
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  16. #56
    Consul Sirveri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    6,241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by н-υ-п-т-ε-я View Post
    Like pigs eat anything that they can bite, true brainwashed liberals accept anything that the people in power tell them to believe in!
    Either that or people just happen to have different opinions on certain matters.

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshyyy View Post
    There is some serious misquoting potential above.
    The rep system should be abolished.

  17. #57
    Consul Lurk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midwest U.S.
    Posts
    5,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    post
    While that is much better, it still ignores the fact that in the vast majority of cases the mother's life is not being endangered (having a dolphin, or any animal's teeth around your leg for months is life threatening).

    Here's something from a pro-abortion website: http://www.womenscenter.com/abortion_reasons.html

    The most common underlying reasons for abortion were 1) they could not afford a child at the time and were unmarried (42%), 2) it would interfere with their education (38%), 3) it would interfere with their employment (38%), and 4) they were students or planning to enroll in studies (34%). Other reasons are having relationship problems, not ready for another child, or don’t want people to know they had sex or got pregnant, the health of the fetus, victim of ****, or became pregnant as result of incest.
    (not sure which way this site leans) http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us...ion_statistics

    <0.5% Victim of ****
    3% Fetal health problems
    4% Physical health problems
    4% Would interfere with education or career
    7% Not mature enough to raise a child
    8% Don't want to be a single mother
    19% Done having children
    23% Can't afford a baby
    25% Not ready for a child
    6% Other
    So your analogy only works for <7.5% of all abortion cases. The rest are due to reasons of convenience. I don't use that term to say that they're being narcissists; what I mean by that is that they are putting their lives first and not considering alternative options.

    What I find sad/disturbing about your post is that you seem to regard pregnancy as something inherently dangerous, something that is a negative (and always negative) consequence that has to be, but isn't, taken into account when having a healthy sex life. I regard pregnancy as the natural end to a natural act that a loving partner can take part in, albeit indirectly. I regard it as an expression of one's humanity in general and femininity in particular, and to attempt to destroy that is to participate in self-denial - not the self-denial that can be beautiful in simplicity of life, but the destructive kind of self-denial where one acts more like an animal than a human being with responsibilities and a duty to the human community to foster life.

    The ironic thing is that I agree with the vast majority of things feminists have to say. However, in conversations like these I walk away with evidence that I'm much more of a feminist than many feminists allow themselves to be.
    Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.

    [7:32 AM] Jason (Al Bundy raidslave): Who the **** loses an arti to 18 phalanx
    [7:32 AM] Old Timer US1: The same faction that loses one to 66 legos

  18. #58
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    How about every time you have sex there is a small chance that you will have to climb a mountain naked to pick the baby up from the magic fairies who deliver them. You will probably get there, but you'll have frostbite on your ***** and it will be an agonizing last few hours. The fairies will implant you with the means to feed the baby (screwing with your hormones for years). You have to do this to get those babies you want as well, remember. But if you accidentally "get" a baby order, you can cancel it and the fairies will discard the test tube.

    See, there's just no real analogies

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    While that is much better, it still ignores the fact that in the vast majority of cases the mother's life is not being endangered (having a dolphin, or any animal's teeth around your leg for months is life threatening).
    So what, it was just an analogy, and in my dolphin version your life was not in danger, you just had to stay in the water and would (probably) be alright. Just like pregnancy, there's a lot of things you can't do that you could. A lot of things you can't eat, and your status as a human being is forever changed if don't already have kids.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    So your analogy only works for <7.5% of all abortion cases. The rest are due to reasons of convenience. I don't use that term to say that they're being narcissists; what I mean by that is that they are putting their lives first and not considering alternative options.
    So is you wanting your normal life rather than letting the dolphin live by staying in the water for a few months. It's just for your convenience really.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    What I find sad/disturbing about your post is that you seem to regard pregnancy as something inherently dangerous, something that is a negative (and always negative) consequence that has to be, but isn't, taken into account when having a healthy sex life.
    No, I don't. But childbirth is more dangerous than an abortion. And a medical abortion is a lot safer than a backyard version. The easier and less complicated getting an abortion is, the safer it is.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    I regard pregnancy as the natural end to a natural act that a loving partner can take part in, albeit indirectly. I regard it as an expression of one's humanity in general and femininity in particular, and to attempt to destroy that is to participate in self-denial - not the self-denial that can be beautiful in simplicity of life, but the destructive kind of self-denial where one acts more like an animal than a human being with responsibilities and a duty to the human community to foster life.
    Well bully for you. I guess you never had a one night stand, or a short term relationship, or approve of relief sex, or any sex without the albeit low expectation of pregnancy. Life's not like that. You aren't the one whose body and life will be under the massive changes ahead - no, even as the father. He gets a change in his lifestyle mostly to do with added responsibilities (which, remember a lot of men try to get out of). He does not get to carry the baby or to give birth. He can get all misty eyed at the magic of childbirth, and the massive hormone fluxes that the mother goes through gives her an enormous sense of relief as well. But ask any woman, except the very few lucky ones, and it is a totally traumatizing experience for your body, and your psyche. If you want the child, it all becomes part of the deal. But you are NEVER the same again. I've done it several times. One pregnancy ended in 4 hrs in surgery, another almost killed me because I wasn't close to a hospital when I miscarried. 2 were successful. But if I had got pregnant again, I would have terminated in a heartbeat. For a lot of reasons. Some, under your rules were convenience based. My husband might have wanted more kids, but I was not prepared to have more. And it was my choice and my traumatized body.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    The ironic thing is that I agree with the vast majority of things feminists have to say. However, in conversations like these I walk away with evidence that I'm much more of a feminist than many feminists allow themselves to be.
    Why? Because you value the woman's ability to conceive? Whoopee. We live with it. I have no issue with any woman who wants to bring heaps of kids into the world and is prepared to give her life up to deal with the consequences. As long as the father takes on his part of the deal. Permanently. But all the feel good waffle about humanity and femininity is a very long way from your mind when you are groaning in agony or close to death (or feel like it). Or when some young girl who accidentally got pregnant can see her chosen life slipping away from her. Permanently.
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  19. #59
    Philosopher н-υ-п-т-ε-я's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    in my body of course
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirveri View Post
    Either that or people just happen to have different opinions on certain matters.
    most people's opinions are based on copying others with shallow reasons, just because they share similar values.
    Quote Originally Posted by Avicenna
    That whose existence is necessary must necessarily be one essence.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rumi
    What you are seeking is also seeking you.

  20. #60
    Consul The Blazin1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Murica... **** yeah
    Posts
    6,858

    Default

    Lurk, you are beating a dead horse,.Rok is the kind of person who believes abortion is solely for women to decide, but expects a man to do his part when the woman decides to have the baby.
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron D'Holbach View Post
    You should quote yourself. It's like liking your Facebook status or high-fiving yourself in the mirror.

    It's what I would do if I didn't have to keep mine exactly how it is for madsquirrels and erazer.

  21. #61
    Consul Lurk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midwest U.S.
    Posts
    5,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    How about every time you have sex there is a small chance that you will have to climb a mountain naked to pick the baby up from the magic fairies who deliver them. You will probably get there, but you'll have frostbite on your ***** and it will be an agonizing last few hours.
    I would take the frostbite on my ***** for my sons. And if it meant having another kid. No problem at all. I've already taken the blue balls for several months; frostbite on my lower head for a few hours doesn't really sound like all that big a deal anymore.

    And yes, blue balls actually do physically hurt. Even after "taking care of it yourself" there's still pain afterwards. Maybe not as bad as a cooter slap or menstrual cramps, but they have meds for both those things that don't take care of the former.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    See, there's just no real analogies
    Well, I agree with you there. That doesn't take away my right to give you **** for using stupid ones.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    So is you wanting your normal life rather than letting the dolphin live by staying in the water for a few months. It's just for your convenience really.
    In a sense, yes, actually. Ignoring that a human life far outweighs that of a dolphin (at least to me), I don't really see how pregnancy in and of itself (assuming adoption is considered as a legit option here in our dialogue) can destroy one's career/education/reputation as much as people that get abortions seem to imagine. But you're right, I made smart choices in my teen/college years so I can't relate on the level of hysteria and histrionics that apparently result from non-smart decisions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    No, I don't. But childbirth is more dangerous than an abortion. And a medical abortion is a lot safer than a backyard version. The easier and less complicated getting an abortion is, the safer it is.
    I haven't claimed the contrary, so I'm not sure how this is relevant.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    Well bully for you. I guess you never had a one night stand, or a short term relationship, or approve of relief sex, or any sex without the albeit low expectation of pregnancy. Life's not like that.
    Not really. Short term relationship, sure, but again, smart decisions. And if I'd made a stupid decision I wouldn't have expected someone else to pay with their life for the comfort of my own.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    And it was my choice and my traumatized body.
    Meeeeee. MEEEEEEE. MEEEE. MY CHOICE. MINE.

    Do you have any idea how puerile you sound right now? It's almost like Lord of the Flies. Kill the pig! Suck its blood!


    Quote Originally Posted by Rokchick View Post
    Or when some young girl who accidentally got pregnant can see her chosen life slipping away from her. Permanently.
    People do stupid **** all the time that causes the "chosen" ideal to "slip away" and it's only in pregnancy that someone else is expected to pay for it, both in blood in the case of the "fetus" and in money in the case of the taxpayers/insurance companies. In this case, roughly 99% of the time it's the direct result of one's deliberate actions. I could have a bit more sympathy if it were a total accident of fate. But we have to learn how to live with those consequences. That's a big part of maturity and a big part of being an adult in this sad, cruel, cold world.

    All the crap that you're giving me for being "misty-eyed" or whatever, applies equally to your bull**** about this puppies-and-kittens "chosen life" that you whine about. Hardly anyone gets their "chosen life" that they dream about as a kid, and the ones that do are usually the ones with silver spoons jammed so far up their ***** that they can't eat their steak without tasting metal. It's not a bad lesson for people to learn. Especially women, who are conditioned to believe that they're all princesses or whatever.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    Lurk, you are beating a dead horse,.Rok is the kind of person who believes abortion is solely for women to decide, but expects a man to do his part when the woman decides to have the baby.
    Oh, I know. Her whole argument has plenty of misogynistic overtones too. We'll get to that part. I'm enjoying the ride for now.
    Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.

    [7:32 AM] Jason (Al Bundy raidslave): Who the **** loses an arti to 18 phalanx
    [7:32 AM] Old Timer US1: The same faction that loses one to 66 legos

  22. #62
    Consul Rokchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    -32 degrees latitude, free, safe and warm
    Posts
    8,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    Lurk, you are beating a dead horse,.Rok is the kind of person who believes abortion is solely for women to decide, but expects a man to do his part when the woman decides to have the baby.
    Actually I don't. Or I do with riders. If the man wants the child as well, then he should do his part for the life of the child. If he didn't ever want it, then I don't think he should even see it. But if you are talking about support payments, that's usually the governmenet trying to offset its own payments. If neither wanted it, then both need to get the same deal. But they often don't.
    I'm glad I'm not judgemental like all you smug, superficial idiots

  23. #63
    Consul The Blazin1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Murica... **** yeah
    Posts
    6,858

    Default

    So, if the man doesn't want a kid, he should be allowed to have the baby aborted without consent of the woman carrying the child. Then child support is a non-issue.
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron D'Holbach View Post
    You should quote yourself. It's like liking your Facebook status or high-fiving yourself in the mirror.

    It's what I would do if I didn't have to keep mine exactly how it is for madsquirrels and erazer.

  24. #64
    Consul The Burninator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Great Garden State
    Posts
    8,570

    Default

    All this talk and I still have yet to see a justification for why it would be that any person would be morally required to sustain the life of another out of their own life energies if they don't want to.

    Points:
    1) I don't believe that a fetus is as valuable as a life. A fetus is a *potential* human life. This is valuable for sure, but given the choice between saving a conscious, thinking, considering human being and an unborn child, I will take the conscious, thinking, feeling person. (And so should you -- there is always a nonzero chance that an unborn child will die in childbirth or early infancy, making the expected value greater for saving someone who has already passed these stages.)

    However, for the sake of argument, it can be granted as a gift to the "pro-life" crowd that a fetus is as valuable as a person.

    2) A fetus cannot survive without siphoning the life energies of its mother.

    3) This relationship imposes real costs upon the mother.

    4) It doesn't seem to me like anyone can say that the mother is required to bear these costs. Sure, personally I think it's better if she wants to. But on what grounds do we say it's required that she do so? There's a difference between me thinking personally that "it's praiseworthy for someone to voluntarily take on this burden," and claiming "it's required that she do so."

    Even if I, personally, agreed initially on paper to supporting another life out of my own energies and at cost to myself, if I decided at any point that I could not bear those costs, I would view myself as clearly within my rights to terminate that support relationship even at the cost of the life of the one I'd agreed to support.

    Again, I'd *prefer* not feeling that way; I agree that it would be better if I could continue to voluntarily bear the costs, but if this becomes not the case, I don't see how anyone else could place a legal requirement upon me to continue paying them.

    TL;DR: it's incumbent upon people who think abortion ought to be illegal to show why someone supporting another at significant cost to themselves (i.e. out of their own life energy) should be legally required to do so, or even morally required to do so (recognizing that establishing that it would be praiseworthy to do so doesn't establish any kind of requirement by itself).

  25. #65
    Consul Lurk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midwest U.S.
    Posts
    5,574

    Default

    I object to the phrase "life energies." You jack***** make it sound like it's some kind of soul-sucking Star Trek kind of alien life that came from outer space for the sole purpose of personally tearing out your entire existence. It's ******* calories for godssake. Maybe a bowl of oatmeal's worth. Most people in this country eat that on their way to work, and that's when they're not stuffing their faces with ice cream, pie, and The View after work. Plus you took conscious and deliberate actions that led to it being there in the first place. And Burn, if you're anything like the women I've slept with, you didn't just take deliberate actions. You refused to even talk to me when I got home till after I put some of my pre-fetal sugar in your bowl.

    Remember, the pill is only 100% effective if you hold it between your thighs.

    If you grant to the pro-life people that a fetus is/can be as valuable as a person, and then follow the rest of your line of logic, then no-one that is dependent upon another human being for survival has a right to live. I should be up for abortion since my livelihood depends upon other people. My 10 year old should be eligible to be aborted because if I chucked him out of my house he wouldn't be able to support himself. My grandmother should definitely be eligible to be aborted since she is almost completely senile and requires assistance to get food in her mouth, let alone on the table.

    Anyone with debilitating illnesses should be able to be killed by their power of attorney or equivalent. Michael J. Fox's doctor should have the right to abort him should his doctor determine that it's in society's best interest.
    Last edited by Lurk; 01-16-2017 at 03:56 PM.
    Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.

    [7:32 AM] Jason (Al Bundy raidslave): Who the **** loses an arti to 18 phalanx
    [7:32 AM] Old Timer US1: The same faction that loses one to 66 legos

  26. #66
    Consul The Blazin1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Murica... **** yeah
    Posts
    6,858

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Burninator View Post
    All this talk and I still have yet to see a justification for why it would be that any person would be morally required to sustain the life of another out of their own life energies if they don't want to.

    Points:
    1) I don't believe that a fetus is as valuable as a life. A fetus is a *potential* human life. This is valuable for sure, but given the choice between saving a conscious, thinking, considering human being and an unborn child, I will take the conscious, thinking, feeling person. (And so should you -- there is always a nonzero chance that an unborn child will die in childbirth or early infancy, making the expected value greater for saving someone who has already passed these stages.)

    However, for the sake of argument, it can be granted as a gift to the "pro-life" crowd that a fetus is as valuable as a person.

    2) A fetus cannot survive without siphoning the life energies of its mother.

    3) This relationship imposes real costs upon the mother.

    4) It doesn't seem to me like anyone can say that the mother is required to bear these costs. Sure, personally I think it's better if she wants to. But on what grounds do we say it's required that she do so? There's a difference between me thinking personally that "it's praiseworthy for someone to voluntarily take on this burden," and claiming "it's required that she do so."

    Even if I, personally, agreed initially on paper to supporting another life out of my own energies and at cost to myself, if I decided at any point that I could not bear those costs, I would view myself as clearly within my rights to terminate that support relationship even at the cost of the life of the one I'd agreed to support.

    Again, I'd *prefer* not feeling that way; I agree that it would be better if I could continue to voluntarily bear the costs, but if this becomes not the case, I don't see how anyone else could place a legal requirement upon me to continue paying them.

    TL;DR: it's incumbent upon people who think abortion ought to be illegal to show why someone supporting another at significant cost to themselves (i.e. out of their own life energy) should be legally required to do so, or even morally required to do so (recognizing that establishing that it would be praiseworthy to do so doesn't establish any kind of requirement by itself).
    Because they made the life, life is there. Plenty of options to prevent pregnancy. By your opinion, if the child you decided to have was seriously injured, and you decided the cost was to high for medical treatment, you should be allowed to kill it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron D'Holbach View Post
    You should quote yourself. It's like liking your Facebook status or high-fiving yourself in the mirror.

    It's what I would do if I didn't have to keep mine exactly how it is for madsquirrels and erazer.

  27. #67
    Consul Lurk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midwest U.S.
    Posts
    5,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Burninator View Post
    2) A fetus cannot survive without siphoning the life energies of its mother.

    3) This relationship imposes real costs upon the mother.

    4) It doesn't seem to me like anyone can say that the mother is required to bear these costs. Sure, personally I think it's better if she wants to. But on what grounds do we say it's required that she do so? There's a difference between me thinking personally that "it's praiseworthy for someone to voluntarily take on this burden," and claiming "it's required that she do so."
    1). A senile old broad cannot survive without siphoning the life energies (since calories and emotions = life energies in Dip****landia) of multiple people.

    2). This relationship imposes real cost upon her caretakers, society, and family.

    3). It doesn't seem to me that anyone can say that society/caretakers/family should be required to bear these costs. Sure, personally I think it's better if they want to. But on what grounds do we say that it's required that we do so?
    Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.

    [7:32 AM] Jason (Al Bundy raidslave): Who the **** loses an arti to 18 phalanx
    [7:32 AM] Old Timer US1: The same faction that loses one to 66 legos

  28. #68
    Artisan Eric Rasputin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    You don't need to know
    Posts
    902

    Default

    I thought this thread was about Obama. Guess I was wrong.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ms. Evil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by The Blazin1 View Post
    Aw, you shouldn't have.
    Don't you have a hole to die in?

  29. #69
    Consul Lurk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midwest U.S.
    Posts
    5,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Rasputin View Post
    I thought this thread was about Obama. Guess I was wrong.
    Obama's existence is dependent upon other people's money. He's eligible too under Roklogik. But his mother was white, so not under PPlogic.
    Last edited by Lurk; 01-16-2017 at 04:07 PM.
    Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.

    [7:32 AM] Jason (Al Bundy raidslave): Who the **** loses an arti to 18 phalanx
    [7:32 AM] Old Timer US1: The same faction that loses one to 66 legos

  30. #70
    Philosopher н-υ-п-т-ε-я's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    in my body of course
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Burninator View Post
    A fetus cannot survive without siphoning the life energies of its mother.
    "Liberal" issue with "superficial" reason!
    Quote Originally Posted by Lurk View Post
    It's ******* calories for godssake.
    "conservative" defence with "scientific" reason!
    ----
    Quote Originally Posted by Avicenna
    That whose existence is necessary must necessarily be one essence.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rumi
    What you are seeking is also seeking you.

  31. #71
    Consul The Blazin1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Murica... **** yeah
    Posts
    6,858

    Default

    Lurk, you erased that as I was replying. Why should I pay for anti-freeze when i can just pinch their oxygen tube closed. Telling me to STFU isn't very nice.
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron D'Holbach View Post
    You should quote yourself. It's like liking your Facebook status or high-fiving yourself in the mirror.

    It's what I would do if I didn't have to keep mine exactly how it is for madsquirrels and erazer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •